Search for: "Guest v. State of Delaware." Results 41 - 60 of 195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2021, 10:11 am by Eugene Volokh
"] So held Delaware state court judge Eric Davis yesterday, in US Dominion, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Pfizer Case The Delaware Superior Court’s decision in Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:13 am by Thalia Kruger
(L 199) 40 (EC), art 1 (2) (f). [4] See eg Case C-212/97, Centros Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 2:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Marriott ultimately determined that the breach exposed the personal data of over 500 million guests. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
If the board was involved in the challenged transaction, Delaware courts applied the standard set forth by the Delaware Supreme Court in Aronson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 2:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Importantly, as the SEC recognized, the United States Supreme Court held in Aaron v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Fox News Media asked a court in Delaware to dismiss a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit filed against it by Dominion Voting Systems over false claims about the 2020 presidential election amplified by some of its on-air personalities and guests. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Three California state courts enforced federal forum provisions for Delaware companies in Wong v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
ABA Model Rule 8.4(g) in the States, 68 Catholic University Law Review 629 (2020). [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” Supreme Court decides Liu On June 22, 2020, the United States Supreme Court decided Liu v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:55 am by Thomas Key
 Last week, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware ruled that this "passive" ownership and operation does not constitute a volitional act and, thus, does not constitute actionable copyright infringement. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:57 pm by Katie Bart
Adams, a case that asks whether a provision in the Delaware constitution that seeks to ensure bipartisanship in the state’s courts violates the U.S. [read post]