Search for: "HALE v. RECORD." Results 41 - 60 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Nonetheless, as Lady Hale points out, this cake’s message did implicate these bakers’ consciences. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm by Thomas Fisher
Could the next president carry out the same policy absent a record of animus? [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:14 am
Oral Argument Preview In Atkins v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix.
  Both he and Lady Hale (at §70) cited D v Home Office [2006] 1 WLR 1003 apparently with approval which required a causation test as regards breaches of the 2001 Rules. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:13 am by CMS
Handing down a unanimous decision, Lady Hale in Cape Intermediate Holdings Limited v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) ruled that the default position is that the public should be allowed access not only to parties’ submissions and arguments, but also to documents which have been placed before the court and referred to during the hearing. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lady Hale agreed with the majority, but noted that since Mr Catt has not been and is not likely to be involved in criminal activity, it would have been disproportionate to keep a nominal record about him. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:24 am by Joy Waltemath
The entire panel agreed, however, that summary judgment was properly granted on her public policy wrongful discharge claim since she failed to show that a state regulation setting forth baseline recordkeeping requirements for pharmacies mirrored the state whistleblower law or that she ever reported a violation (Hale v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
It is also right to record that the issue of mandatory relief did not arise in the Ali cases because all the applicants had been rehoused by the time that the appeal came to be determined; and Lady Hale at (64) stated that she “would not be inclined to enter into debate about the criteria governing the grant of mandatory injunctions in homelessness cases”. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am by MATHEW PURCHASE
The minority (Lady Hale and Lords Kerr and Clarke) considered that the notice read like a mere request and should have been firmer: paragraphs 103, 122, and 155. [read post]