Search for: "HALL V. PRO ACCESS" Results 41 - 60 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Similarly, in the Alberta decision Webb v Birkett, 2011 ABCA 13, the lawyer was under the impression that collaborative practice allowed for a reduced standard of financial disclosure. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
On 18 August  Hawktalk had a post “Exam results: no automated decision, no transparency, no right of access and perhaps no adequacy”. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 25 May 2020, default judgment was given in the defamation case of Duncan v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
Such debate is just as important online as it is in our universities, our town halls, and our homes. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
Such debate is just as important online as it is in our universities, our town halls, and our homes. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
What is the profession’s collective ethical responsibility vis-a-vis access to justice? [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Trump has consistently maintained that he did nothing wrong and that there was no quid pro quo with Ukraine. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
The court looked into the jurisprudence surrounding access and relying on the case of N.Coast Indus v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
We should vote only for those candidates that present solutions to the access to justice-unaffordable legal services problem (the “A2J problem”). [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette has reported that IMPRESS may split in the next three years with the view to broadening the remit of its services to include elements such as pro bono work. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 3:01 am by SHG
Even if one is pro-choice, this mandate goes a few steps beyond the right to have access to an abortion, but that’s not the issue here. [read post]