Search for: "HARDY DAY V. THE STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
On November 14, 2013, which was within the thirty days allowed by 28 U.S.C. 1367(d), the federal supplemental jurisdiction savings statute, the Antoons re-filed the medical malpractice case in state court. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Kennedy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:20 am
Hardy (1971), 28 Ohio St.2d 89, 57 O.O.2d 284, 276 N.E.2d 247; and State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Derek Hardy v. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Hardy, which upheld a law restricting the hours of miners. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The name of the Missouri case is Keeley v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:01 am
Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006) (cited favorably by State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
The rest of the crop are long-running state-on-top habeas relists involving claims that a court of appeals gave insufficient deference to state-court decisions: Hardy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
Maxwell, 10-1548 (Ninth Circuit, fourth relist), and Hardy v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:29 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
Schwartz Partner Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
In Cooper v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing… [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 2:09 pm
So, there is also no question that plaintiff’s state law claims are preempted under Riegel v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:28 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:34 am
In State v. [read post]
