Search for: "HARPER v. LORD"
Results 41 - 51
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
Thou already has a laptop, a netbook, a Blueberry and Lord knows what other pointless gadgets – what reason has thou for more electronic fripperies? [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
While in most cases it will be a media defendant who wishes to rely on the defence, there is Privy Council authority to the effect that the privilege can be asserted by a non-media defendant (Seaga v Harper [2008] UKPC 9). [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
In the Courts In the case of R (on the application of Harper) v Aldershot Magistrates Court [2010] EWHC 1319 (Admin) two senior police officers facing trial on criminal charges failed in an attempt to overturn a decision to make their addresses public. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:27 pm
Circuit in Comcast v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
New York: Harper & Row, 1972. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Rep. 489, 498 (1763) (Lord Chief Justice Pratt). [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Selma, Lord, Selma (TVM 1999). [read post]
