Search for: "HARRIS v. JONES et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
JONES, Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
§ 6021 et seq. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Link to opinion here.Ashraf Mahmoud, et al v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:30 pm
World Programming Ltd., 874 F. 3d 370 (4th.Cir.2017) College of Optometrists of Ontario et al v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
l al-fiqh / by Ihsan Abdul-Wajid Bagby. 1986 v, 244 leaves ; 28 cm. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
(mem. op.); also see Foster v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
Harris Author’s Citation Award. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:25 pm
” In re Jeffrey Beard, et al, 2010 U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
FLOWERS, INC., et al., Debtors. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
Jones, et. al., 2010 U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The Commission is a body created under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (Act), as amended, 18 U.S.C. 3551 et seq. (1982 ed., Supp. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
(relisted after the October 26 conference) CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
PIONEER MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et. al, The Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act affords certain protections to elders and dependent adults. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
In a longitudinal study that followed 4,724 known sex offenders over a period of 15 years, 24% were charged with, or convicted of, a new sexual offense (Harris & Hanson, 2004). [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Jones. 1981. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Easton Enterprises et al (CAFC 2010-1057, -1116) precedential Tokai didn't get evidence in because of procedural error: failure to submit written reports for its experts, Jones and Sung. [read post]