Search for: "HEAD v. NATIONAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure… [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a judgment and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:49 am
Nationalization & Trends in Increasing State Ownership Roughly three-quarters of the Russian economy has been privatized, [31] but some investors cite the fear of nationalization (the transfer of privately owned assets into public ownership) as a reason for their reluctance to invest. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The National Surveillance State Goes Local (June 12, 2006)108. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm
Ledesma-Cadhit et al, the plaintiffs invoked the PHACA as a basis for suing a physician and pharmaceutical company in negligence, after their 5 year old daughter died, allegedly as a result of the administration of the H1N1 influenza vaccination during a pandemic health risk in 2009. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
Nikola Šainović et al., Case No. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm
On October 31, the European Union and the United States agreed on temporary measures to settle their dispute over US Section 232 national security tariffs on EU steel and aluminium products. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:50 pm
Lohmus, Havel & Viisemann, et al in 2005. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
It has given us unprecedented access to public affairs information—local, state, national, and international. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
In a recent NBER report by David Altig et. al., researchers found that by earning an extra $1,000, one in four of the poorest households, regardless of age, gives half to two-thirds of their paycheck to the government in taxes due to marginal net tax rates above 70 percent on earned income.[1] This has significant implications for work incentives and tax credit eligibility if filers combine their incomes and continue working. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IPBiz),Eco-patent commons meets open innovation: (Securing Innovation),Settle the patent infringement case by selling your company? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
That this is the case, should not be hard to accept… in 2012, the road to the White House runs directly through the states hardest hit by the foreclosure crisis, most notably Ohio and Florida, but also Michigan, Nevada, and North Carolina, et al. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
