Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL V. UNITED STATES " Results 41 - 60 of 1,016
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
Swaroop claims the plaintiffs did not “exhaust domestic remedies,” which would mean mitigation measures and damages received from the plaintiffs’ home state of Portugal, before seeking international remedies. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm by Bill Marler
Worldwide, non-O157 STEC outbreaks emerged in the 1980s, and the first reported outbreaks in the United States occurred in the 1990s. [57, 55] The number of reported outbreaks due to non-O157 STECs remains relatively low in the United States, but experts agree that documented outbreaks probably represent the “tip of the iceberg. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 5:00 am by James Jolin
For example, the home is a new arena for health care, from home tests for COVID-19, to in-home monitoring of cardiac symptoms, to self-managed abortion, to medical marijuana. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am by Ioannis Kouvakas
Section 253(8), for example, states that a technical capability notice “may be given to persons outside the United Kingdom (and may require things to be done, or not to be done, outside the United Kingdom). [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm by Larry
Basically, the Home Products case was properly before the Court of International Trade. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am by INFORRM
United States A federal judge has dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed by former President Donald Trump against CNN. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
The United States is the world’s largest importer of goods, with many of the products we rely on being produced by international companies. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It defines Scope 3 emissions as “indirect upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions, other than scope 2 emissions, from sources that the reporting entity does not own or directly control and may include, but are not limited to, purchased goods and services, business travel, employee commutes, and processing and use of sold products. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]