Search for: "HTC V. IPCOM "
Results 41 - 51
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 46 [week ending on Sunday 17 May] – Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc | "Three aspects of information: Current issues in trade secrets, client confidentiality and privilege" -- a new event | CJEU upon distribution right in Dimensione Direct Sales srl and Michele Labianca v Knoll International SpA| UK Supreme Court on Mere reputation and… [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
AbbVie also argued that since Arrow was decided nine years ago, the appellate courts have been more willing to permit EPO procedures to take their course without English judicial interference (see Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd [2013] UK SC 46; [2014] A.C. 160, as summarised by Floyd LJ in IPcom GmbH & Co KG v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 1496; [2014] R.P.C. 12.)Carr J… [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
He then referred to the guidance on stays provided by the Court of Appeal in the recent case of IPCOM v HTC [2013] EWCA Civ 1496 before concluding that it is still very hard to get a stay in the UK courts, particularly if the patentee is willing to give undertakings to repay any monetary compensation they receive for infringement of a patent which is subsequently revoked. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:38 pm
HTC, both in Mannheim and more than four years ago). [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
Our beloved blogmeister posted a short report last week on the decision of the Court of Appeal in the IPCom/HTC case, concerning the guidance on whether patent infringement cases should be stayed in this country when there are pending opposition proceedings at the European Patent Office.The timing of the decision was very interesting to this Kat. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(IP Osgoode) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit remands cybersquatting case to Western District: Lahoti v Vericheck (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Looking Out for Its Interests http://t.co/LUb9IuREh3 -> #IntellectualProperty trending on Twitter: Considering IP in the age of the hashtag http://t.co/r4zeI7Gb4V -> Breaking news: Court of Appeal affirms "no-stay" decision in IPCom/HTC patent scrap http://t.co/2mF64X0u21 -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-11-20: Conservatives set to introduce cyberbullying legislation htt… http://t.co/kzVR4WXI4a -> Is Google the “Snow White” of the Patent… [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 10:21 am
Case in point, the Munich I Regional Court wil hold an OPPO v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
After IPCom issued an upbeat media release on its recent German litigation with HTC, Nokia has issued its own third-party riposte. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
In the PAE case IPCom v HTC, a German judge held that: The Chamber does assume in principle that the enforcement of a cease-and-desist claim can be disproportionate since rights arising from a patent are not granted without limits (Art. 14 (2) of the Basic Law, § 242 of the German Civil Code). [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 4:23 am
This is plainly massive.Hard evidence of OPPO and OnePlus having left the German marketI had mentioned in several previous posts the possibility of OPPO determining that it was too costly to stay in the German market, and then I ran a Twitter search to see whether someone else had also reported on yesterday's Nokia v. [read post]
