Search for: "HUGHES v. MARTIN"
Results 41 - 60
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
Rose Hughes publishes the first part of the review of the “Pregabalin: Where stand plausibility and Swiss-formclaims” event hold at UCL a “great and good pass comment” on Warner Lambert v Actavis. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:45 am
Quinta examined whether the Justice Department subtlely admitted doubts over Trump’s oath in its brief on appeal in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 8:51 am
Domenico Garufi v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:47 pm
No. 2249512 --registered by a Texas company called John Hughes Ceramic Tile Contractor. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Martin, 36 Loyola L.A. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Martins v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
” Another look at the case comes from Patrick Hughes at Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am
Part 2 – Hugh Tomlinson QC Privacy: the way ahead? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Intern Kat Rose Hughes dives deep into the artificial intelligence (AI) universe to review a series of recently published international patent applications filed by DeepMind: DeepMind: First major AI patent filings revealedKatfriend Gwilym Roberts of Kilburn & Strode provides an insight into the ethical dilemmas that arise in the AI patenting area. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
Alexandra Mezulanik, research assistant at UCL IBIL, examines the much anticipated decision in Martin v Kogan of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
V. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:30 am
Cheffins and Bobby V. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:30 am
Cheffins and Bobby V. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:39 am
Jones 13th floor 269th 176th Judge Nikita V. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:01 am
This organization was instrumental in laying the groundwork for the civil rights cases that culminated in the landmark 1954 Supreme Court case Brown v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Hughes v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
No doubt they mean well and aren’t beholden to Access Copyright – but their opinions are so over the top and poorly informed that they have a very bad look:Kate Taylor, May 26, 2023 Hugh Stevens, July 15, 2023 Hugh Steven’s opinion piece conveniently follows up just two days later on the announcement by Access Copyright (“AC”) that it was downsizing and restructuring. [read post]
