Search for: "Hale v. Harm" Results 41 - 60 of 226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources More Serious Harm than Good? [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Subjecting both men and women to the policy does mitigate the harm somewhat: each visitor experiences precisely the same open door during their visit. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:15 am by CMS
Handing down its judgment on 30 October 2019, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, with Lady Hale stating that this was a case “bristling with simplicity”. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Handing down a unanimous decision, Lady Hale in Cape Intermediate Holdings Limited v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) ([2019] UKSC 38) ruled that the default position is that the public should be allowed access not only to parties’ submissions and arguments, but also to documents which have been placed before the court and referred to during the hearing. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:13 am by CMS
Handing down a unanimous decision, Lady Hale in Cape Intermediate Holdings Limited v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) ruled that the default position is that the public should be allowed access not only to parties’ submissions and arguments, but also to documents which have been placed before the court and referred to during the hearing. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Carnwarth and Lord Sumption. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:41 am by SHG
As Judge Fahey recites, the harm done with the gun was, as is so often the case, awful. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Section 2 of the Abusive Behaviour and Sexual Harm (Scotland) Act 2016 Erika Rackley91. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The leading judgment for the majority was given by Lord Sumption, with a concurring judgment delivered by Lady Hale. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lady Hale gave a concurring judgment in which she agreed with Lord Sumption that, given the need for a practicable and proportionate scheme, bright-line rules are necessary, and that the categories used are proportionate, save as to the two exceptions Lord Sumption identified. [read post]
The power to remove the child is absolute, save where it is necessary to take steps to protect a person, including a child, from being physically harmed by another. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
On 13 and 14 November 2018 Supreme Court heard the appeal in the crucial “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print Limited. [read post]