Search for: "Hale v. Scott"
Results 41 - 60
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It would be odd and potentially onerous if, even while the authority were simply considering the merits of the claimant’s position, they were unable to house the family in two adjoining units even on a temporary basis.Further, Scott Baker J in R v Ealing London Borough Council ex parte Surdonja [1999] 1 ALL ER 566 took the view that:“In my judgment the obligation is not discharged by providing split accommodation in separate dwellings. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Assistant Attorney General; Gary Born, Partner and Chair, International Arbitration Practice Group, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, Washington, D.C.; ASIL Immediate Past President David D. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:00 am
James V. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm
Lady Hale, who sat with Lord Scott in Savage, did so in forthright terms unlikely to warm judicial relations: “There is no warrant, in the jurisprudence or in humanity, for the distinction … drawn by Lord Scott” [92]. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
Here is a particularly quotable line from Lady Hale at paragraph [92]: “There is no warrant, in the jurisprudence or in humanity, for the distinction between the two duties drawn by Lord Scott in Savage…” We will follow up in the next few days with a full analysis of the decision. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:58 pm
In fact, we handled the Bayou v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
* Scott P. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
The Court of Appeal (Sedley, Richards LJJ, Sir Scott Baker) endorsed the Divisional Court’s finding on the first preliminary issue. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Scott. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Wednesday, Dec. 1 Glen Scott Milner v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
Scott Greenfield just sort of bashes them. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:34 am
Scott Roberts was pissed, too. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
In the case of Too Much Media v Hale the New Jersey ruled this week that blogger Shellee Hale was not a journalist entitled to protect confidential sources and newsgathering information under the State’s “shield law”. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The pressing justification in this case was the mere effect of peer pressure on other students (B Hale at para. 98). [read post]
