Search for: "Harding v. County of Dallas" Results 41 - 60 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2016, 12:00 pm
Widespread voting discrimination doesn’t only exist; it has flourished since the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm by John Floyd
The new provisions give voice to the admonition in Imble v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm by Joey Fishkin
 This is a claim articulated most fully (so far) by Justice Scalia in his brief concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
My co-presenters are Kurt Heyman of Proctor & Heyman LLP in Wilmington, Delaware and Ladd Hirsch of Diamond McCarthy LLP in Dallas, Texas. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:32 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Palo Pinto County insurance lawyers will need to be aware of this case from the Dallas Court of Appeals. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm by Guest Blogger
As struggles in Westchester County, Dallas, St. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:57 pm by Michael Lowe
The email attachments have malware hidden within them that are extremely sophisticated and hard for many security software programs (like the ones most people purchase as anti-virus or spyware protection) to locate and remove. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm by Rick Hasen
CD 9 is located south of Houston and incorporates parts of Harris and Fort Bend Counties, CD 18 is located within Houston, and CD 30 is within Dallas. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:05 pm by Jimmy Verner
The Dallas Court of Appeals bought mother's simplistic argument: If you live in the same place you did ten years ago, there could be no material or substantial change of circumstances no matter where else you lived, or what else happened, in the meantime.The Dallas court cited to, but did not follow, the analysis in, Bates v. [read post]