Search for: "Harmon v. Department of Corrections"
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
It was not until 1961, in Monroe v. [read post]
AI and inventorship guidance: Incentivizing human ingenuity and investment in AI-assisted inventions
12 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
The guidance builds on the existing inventorship framework and the “significant contribution” test from the Federal Circuit’s 1998 Pannu case (Pannu v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:05 am
As I noted when FCC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
"In order to maintain an article 7 tax certiorari proceeding, the aggrieved party must allege in its petition that 'a complaint was made in due time to the proper officers to correct such assessment'" (Larchmont Pancake House, 33 NY3d at 235, quoting RPTL 706 [2]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
"In order to maintain an article 7 tax certiorari proceeding, the aggrieved party must allege in its petition that 'a complaint was made in due time to the proper officers to correct such assessment'" (Larchmont Pancake House, 33 NY3d at 235, quoting RPTL 706 [2]). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1044. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1044 The Foundation filed suit against the Department for failure to comply with CEQA, arguing that the Department’s inaction to maintain and repair the roof of a historic former hotel that it owned was an agency decision subject to CEQA. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1044 The Foundation filed suit against the Department for failure to comply with CEQA, arguing that the Department’s inaction to maintain and repair the roof of a historic former hotel that it owned was an agency decision subject to CEQA. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
York & York v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 8:47 pm
[emphasis added] This is the same approach employed by Justice Sharpe in Griffin v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 8:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
In Drumm v Drumm, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4975452 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
(Very occasionally it can be an issue of enormous and urgent national consequence, such as Bush v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
It chose not to respond extensively to Ethics Council inquiries.In September, the Council had a telephone meeting with an employee from ZTE’s Security & Investor Relations Department and an employee from the company’s legal department. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
”The court in Alcharihi v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
This is correct. [read post]
