Search for: "Harms v. IRS"
Results 41 - 60
of 425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm
Gas Co. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Memo 2013-281, Bibby v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Memo 2013-281, Bibby v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:24 pm
The 6-3 decision in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
IRS). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
For example, in Hanahoe v Hussey [1998] 3 IR 69, [1997] IEHC 173 (14 November 1997) and Gray v Minister for Justice [2007] 2 IR 654, [2007] IEHC 52 (17 January 2007) (extensively discussed here, here, and here), the plaintiffs recovered damages in respect of leaks by Gardaí of their private information. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:27 am
The action, U.S. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
See Whistleblower 14106-10W v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Brunson, Addressing Hate: Georgia, the IRS, and the Ku Klux Klan, (July 31, 2020).Tanner Bean & Robin Fretwell Wilson, The Administrative State as a New Front in the Culture War: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:47 pm
He didn’t decide that the IRS conduct was okay or that no harm was done. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 1:33 pm
The Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
For example, as Finlay CJ put it in Conway v INTO [1991] 2 IR 305, 317 “in respect of damages in tort … ordinary compensatory damages … [are] sums calculated to recompense a wronged plaintiff for physical injury, mental distress,anxiety, deprivation of convenience, or other harmful effects of a wrongful act and/or for monies lost or to be lost and/or expenses incurred or to be incurred by reason of the commission of the wrongful act” (emphasis… [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:22 am
The post Case Review – Witmar Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:52 am
Abreu v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 6:06 pm
Instead, the rule was implemented without comment and, as a result, will cause “significant harm. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:35 pm
I’ve previously noted that the federalism arguments deployed on behalf of the IRS rule authorizing tax credits on federal exchanges have the potential to disrupt other federal programs if adopted by the Supreme Court in King v. [read post]
