Search for: "Harper v. Green*" Results 41 - 60 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
Harper and other recent election law controversies (more on this below). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm by David Kopel
., and Harpers Ferry, Va., were ordered to invent the means of producing firearms with interchangeable parts. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Canada Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper applied to strike out a defamation claim brought by former Cabinet Minister, Helena Guergis in the Ontario Superior Court. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:43 am by INFORRM
In the Courts In the case of R (on the application of Harper) v Aldershot Magistrates Court [2010] EWHC 1319 (Admin) two senior police officers facing trial on criminal charges failed in an attempt to overturn a decision to make their addresses public. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Consider it a replay of that old Hume v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Canada Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is avoiding testifying in a libel lawsuit by invoking parliamentary privilege. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
v=d8CAKAXR-AMAfter that, it was back to the convention center for the exhibits. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
v=d8CAKAXR-AMAfter that, it was back to the convention center for the exhibits. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"Karen Abbot's new work, Liar Temptress Soldier Spy: Four Women Undercover in the Civil War (Harper) is reviewed in both the Washington Post (here), and in the Los Angeles Times (here). [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
`Michael' Pruneda, Jr., Rolando Quintana, for Elmer DeGuzman, Yolanda Lopez, Richard Wecker and Sheryl Hamer, Respondents.Alfred John Harper, III, Arrissa K. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]