Search for: "Harris v. Hobbs"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2019, 2:13 pm
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic (March 25): Whether the Hobbs Act, a federal law that provides a mechanism for courts to review some agency orders, requires a federal district court to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Dutra Group v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:56 am
Supreme Court granted certiorari in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:31 am
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., No. 17-1705. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:45 am
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., No. 17-1705, 2018 WL 3127423, at *1 (U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:20 am
For The Economist, Steven Mazie reports after Wednesday’s oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 10:49 am
But, the district court dismissed Carlton & Harris’s suit, citing the famous 1984 case Chevron USA Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 10:49 am
But, the district court dismissed Carlton & Harris’s suit, citing the famous 1984 case Chevron USA Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., which asks whether the Hobbs Act, a jurisdictional-channeling statute, requires courts to accept the Federal Communications Commission’s interpretation of a statute allowing recipients of “junk faxes” to sue the senders for damages. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:37 pm
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:29 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:19 pm
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc. is a case that decides whether the Hobbs Act forces district courts to accept the legal interpretation of the Federal Communications Commission with regards to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:16 am
The events giving rise to PDR Network v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., 17-1705 Issues: (1) Whether the Hobbs Act strips courts of jurisdiction to engage in a traditional Chevron analysis and requires [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., 17-1705. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 9:10 am
” Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
There is also a comment on the case on the Schillings website by Ben Hobbs. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
v. [read post]
