Search for: "Harris v. Royal" Results 41 - 60 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Kiran Bhat
At this blog, Scott Dodson previews arguments in Wood v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
He sat as a First Tier Information Rights Tribunal Judge for ten years until retirement in 2017 and is the author of Celebrity and Royal Privacy, the Media and the Law (Sweet & Maxwell 2015). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:49 pm by Record on Appeal
Harris – a case involving the reliability of testing protocols related to drug sniffing dogs (is more than a “certification” statement required);  Chaidez v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
 Two of the complaints were by members of the Royal Family, Prince Harry and Prince Andrew. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
 To explain: last week Prince Harry (real forenames Henry Charles Albert David; when you're royal enough or as famous as Madonna, you don't need a surname) was caught by camera wearing nothing but his royal skin, a wristwatch and a necklace (see Katpost here). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Joshua Matz
Harris, a preemption case involving the Federal Meat Inspection Act. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
  One of the claimants, the Duke of Sussex, will be giving evidence – the first senior member of the Royal Family to give evidence since the then Prince of Wales gave evidence in the Royal Baccarat cases in 1891. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:58 am by Minken Employment Lawyers
In Jodoin v Nissan Canada, the Ontario Supreme Court decided that Nissan’s change to Harry Jodoin’s position was a constructive dismissal of his employment and that under the circumstances, he was not expected to continue his employment with Nissan for the purpose of mitigating his damages. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Book Review: Positive Freedom and the Law | Book Review: Law of Remedies - A European Perspective | Trade mark functions, repairs and collective marks: Dutch Supreme Court to refer questions to CJEUNever Too Late 247 [Week ending 5 Jan] EU General Court assesses whether ‘cinkciarz’ is descriptive for banking and exchanging money services (spoiler alert: no, its not) | The first Spotify Awards and the role played by streaming services in access to digital content | Meghan Markle… [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
These modern instances were set against the backdrop of numerous previous royal private moments made public; Squidgygate, Camillagate, Fergie-toegate, Harry-strippokergate to swing open just a few. [read post]
AND ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-06-01041-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-31- 07, pet. denied Oct 2009)09-0632APRIL AND JOSHUA RAY VAN HOOSE v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 4:45 am by Sophie Corke
It all depends on how you understand "evocation" | IP Education Series #6Never Too Late 256 [Week ending March 8] Meghan Markle and Prince Harry to abandon “Sussex Royal” UK trade mark applications | EU General Court reiterates that low distinctiveness cannot be offset by specialised public in Balmain cases | [Guest Post] CREATe/BIICL conference report: Mapping Platform Regulation in the UK | [Guest Post] CREATe/BIICL conference… [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 12:10 pm by Vanessa Sauter
Catherine Padhi discussed why a new cert petition in Attias v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:33 am
The company claims that the awards will be "a true reflection of what fans are listening" to.PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes looked back at a busy year for the Enlarged Board of Appeal, examining, amongst others, some of the more controversial cases that 2019 brought, such as Pepper (G 3/19) and Computer simulated inventions (G 1/19).Rose also provided a breakdown of some of the important Board of Appeal cases of 2019, which included highlights such as a new approach from… [read post]