Search for: "Harrison v. Back" Results 41 - 60 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2024, 12:52 pm by Guest Author
The leading contributions so far are by, in alphabetical order, Adler, Bamzai, Bremer, Harrison (x2, x3), Levin, Mizelle, and Sohoni (x2). [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:43 am
  So I dropped Professor Voyiakis a note and we've been e-mailing back and forth. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:52 am
  A couple of years back, the raging fad was the argument that applying State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am by Samuel Sherwood, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court’s reasoning was as follows: Non-disclosure of the commissions Lord Sumption held that the decision in Harrison v Black Horse Ltd, the leading Court of Appeal authority, was wrong. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
This would consequentially force this line of argument to be rejected because the rule cannot go back more than 10 years. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm by Scott Bomboy
He wrote back to Madison, claiming a lack of legal experience and recommending John Davis, a Massachusetts judge, for the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 May 2025, 11:45 am by Jeff R. Vaisa
Attempting to back out mid-process may undermine credibility and trigger judicial enforcement. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In the 1888 election, in particular, Republican Senator Benjamin Harrison defeated the Democratic incumbent, Grover Cleveland, although Harrison lost the popular vote by 90,596 votes.[4]  In what is becoming a familiar narrative, it was the third election (and second in twelve years) in which the popular vote winner lost the Electoral College. [read post]