Search for: "Hassell v. Hassell" Results 41 - 60 of 109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Pronman, 2018 QCCQ 3884 https://t.co/W3ffHXn64I 2018-07-03 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-07-03 https://t.co/GMOPb5y8jx 2018-07-04 All EFF’d Up | Yasha Levine https://t.co/cR90bzK6n0 2018-07-04 California Supreme Court reverses in Hassell v Bird CDA takedown case https://t.co/j1y9kKoyQG 2018-07-04 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-07-04 https://t.co/5mixP0pR3R 2018-07-05 Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-07-04 https://t.co/zObqWZEDcd 2018-07-05… [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Updates for 2018-07-03 https://t.co/GMOPb5y8jx 2018-07-04 All EFF’d Up | Yasha Levine https://t.co/cR90bzK6n0 2018-07-04 California Supreme Court reverses in Hassell v Bird CDA takedown case https://t.co/j1y9kKoyQG 2018-07-04 [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Eric Goldman
Also, though the Supreme Court rejected Hassell’s against Yelp, Hassell still can proceed directly against Bird for violation of the injunction–something that Hassell has not attempted yet. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
Armslist judge explicitly repudiated 20 years of precedent; and don’t forget the slightly related Hassell v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 12:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Court orders addressed to third parties (chiefly in libel cases): Here too Google generally has no legal obligation to deindex material—if you sue me for libel and get an injunction finding that my page libeled you and that I must remove it, that generally doesn't bind Google (though the Hassell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:23 am by Eric Goldman
Indeed, I think it’s the most pernicious Section 230 ruling since Hassell v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Should the injunctions be binding on Google and similar sites, even if they weren’t named as defendants (a question pending before the California Supreme Court, in Hassell v. [read post]