Search for: "Head v. The University" Results 41 - 60 of 3,633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Retromark: the conference is back on 7 May – sign up now!
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm by Eleonora Rosati
DiscoveryDev Gangjee, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of OxfordStephen Reid, Head of Intellectual Property at Imperial Brands PLC 15:40-16:00 – The future of trade marks – revisited (Darren Meale)16:00-16:30 – Coffee/tea break16:30-17:15 – Keynote address: Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer, UKIPO17:15-18:15 – Panel 2 – “A tale of a supreme saga: where does the Supreme Court judgment in Skykick leave us? [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University: Newsletter, 2 March 2024
1 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
In Kejriwal v. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Weekly Roundup: February 23-29, 2024
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
., on Saturday, February 24, 2024 Tags: Investment Stewardship, ISS, pass-through voting, Proxy voting, technology 2024 Proxy Season Preview Posted by Mike Tae and Chuck Callan, Broadridge, on Sunday, February 25, 2024 Tags: Climate change, Environmental proposals, Institutional Investors, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Universal Proxy 2024 Proxy Advisor Guidelines: What Companies Need to Know… [read post]
The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog - https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/
Weekly Roundup: February 23-29, 2024
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
., on Saturday, February 24, 2024 Tags: Investment Stewardship, ISS, pass-through voting, Proxy voting, technology 2024 Proxy Season Preview Posted by Mike Tae and Chuck Callan, Broadridge, on Sunday, February 25, 2024 Tags: Climate change, Environmental proposals, Institutional Investors, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder activism, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Universal Proxy 2024 Proxy Advisor Guidelines: What Companies Need to Know… [read post]
Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance - https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu
Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2023
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am by John Coyle
As Bill has explained, both solutions seem doubtful, and the issue may be headed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net
Access Copyright Adds To Its Lengthy Litany Of Litigation Losses
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm by Howard Knopf
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
Excess Copyright - http://excesscopyright.blogspot.com/
A Perpetual Monopoly
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Multiple Threats Converge to Heighten Disinformation Risks to This Year’s US Elections
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm by Lawrence Norden
” That case, now styled Murthy  v. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
A note on “The BBC Nile” in the High Court of Australia – foreign arbitration agreement and choice of law clause and Article 3(8) of the Amended Hague Rules in Australia
14 Feb 2024, 5:11 pm by Jeanne Huang
By Poomintr Sooksripaisarnkit Lecturer in Maritime Law, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania Introduction On 14th February 2024, the High Court of Australia handed down its judgment in Carmichael Rail Network Pty Ltd v BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co KG [2024] HCA 4. [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net
What To Wear To Jury Duty: Do’s & Don’ts
14 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
Heading to jury duty? [read post]
Schwartzapfel Lawyers Blog - https://www.fightingforyou.com/resource-center/
SEC Rulemaking and Litigation in Chair Gensler’s First 1000 Days
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
The CLS Blue Sky Blog - https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/
Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University: Newsletter, 10 February 2024
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am by INFORRM
In Guerra v. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
SCOTUS dispatch: ‘in the room where it happened’ for the oral arguments in the Trump v. Anderson ballot disqualification case
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm by Marissa Zupancic | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A packed courtroom for the Trump ballot case
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Term Limits v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
“A Short Time Ago in a Galaxy Not So Far Away”… Disney was Sued by an Actress over Free Speech
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am by jonathanturley
Here is the complaint: Carano v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
M.A. v. B.F. (Cal. Ct. App. - Feb. 5, 2024)
6 Feb 2024, 9:58 am
" She eventually goes to a doctor, who says she has something like whiplash from the head pull. [read post]
California Appellate Report - http://calapp.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Blog Post: California: WCAB Practices Are Evolving: Are Their Templates Evolving as Well?
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Therefore, if this had been “real life,” the judge would have ruled in favor of applicant to hold the 2010 head injury not barred by the statute of limitations. [read post]
Legal Insights Blog - https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Fund v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/