Search for: "Heard v. Carr"
Results 41 - 60
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2009, 8:05 pm
Illinois Appellate Court Holds Motion to Compel Arbitration of Individual Claims in Class Action Complaint Alleging Violations of Various Consumer Protection Laws, based on Arbitration Clause Containing Class Action Waiver, Properly Denied because Agreement Required Disputes be Heard by National Arbitration Forum which no Longer Conducted Consumer Arbitrations Plaintiffs filed a putative class action in Illinois state court against Gateway, Intel, Hewlett-Packard and others alleging inter… [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 2:30 am
An interesting judicial observation of Carr J. regarding the sequencing of SEP trials was recently drawn to this blogger's attention by David Barron of Gowling WLG. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:15 am
Last week, Tom Hadden of Pinsent Masons brought the IPKat's attention to a recent decision of Carr J. in TQ Delta LLC v Zyxel Communications UK Limited & Anr [2018] EWHC 1515 (Ch) (Pinsent Masons represent the Defendant). [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 2:19 pm
Vieux Carre Commission Foundation v City of New Orleans, 2018 WL 651668 (LA. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:57 am
New Zealand In the case of Ewan Robert Carr and Brookside Farm Trust Ltd v Gallaway Cook Allan [2014] NZSC 75 (20 June 2014), the Supreme Court considered whether it was permissible to sever from an arbitration agreement an invalid provision which purported to give each party a right to appeal the arbitrator’s award to the High Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 1:39 pm
NFL, Carr v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:34 am
| Rich writer, poor writer | Regeneron v Kymab - Part II: Interpretation and Infringement | Facebook and music rights: the “not-so-heard-not-GDPR-related-news”. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:37 pm
On August 21, 2023, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Raines v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm
Carr (both petitions are titled Kansas v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
| Rich writer, poor writer | Regeneron v Kymab - Part II: Interpretation and Infringement | Facebook and music rights: the “not-so-heard-not-GDPR-related-news”. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
Yesterday, the court heard arguments in two redistricting cases from Virginia and North Carolina, Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:30 am
The Court did not pause to mention a challenge pending before the Supreme Court, Carr v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
| BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product | (Belatedly) remembering Raymond Niro, the most influential person in patent litigation whom you may have never heard of | Genuine use of three dimensional EU trade marks - heated arguments over ovens | Wild Boys Sometimes Lose It: Duran Duran fail to reclaim their US copyright |Around the IP Blogs Photo credit: Steve Jurvetson [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm
On 9 July 2021 the Court of Appeal (Popplewell, Dingemans and Carr LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism [2021] EWCA Civ 1006 (heard 24 June 2021). [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after a public hearing are outstanding: Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism, heard 24 June 2021 (P [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On 18 May 2023 there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Carr v Carr. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
Carr and Montgomery v. [read post]
