Search for: "Heights v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
Wallace (1939), and United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 10:14 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:00 am
The Claremont Canyon Conservancy v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 11:19 am
See also: Skolnik v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
For example, in Unico Mechanical Corporation, the GAO sustained the protest where the agency unreasonably assessed a weakness (1) notwithstanding the proposal met the solicitation’s stated minimum requirement, and (2) for a mistaken finding that the offeror did not address a feature in its proposal. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
., (and others), filed suit in New York County Supreme Court alleging that the conditions violated the state’s Labor Law – particularly Section 240(1) – which protects workers from elevation-related risks.In this instance because the height differential from the top of the ramp to the ground was about 20 to 25 feet, both the Supreme Court, and the Appellate Division, First Department, were of the view that that triggered an obligation to provide “safety… [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 5:13 pm
The post Cybertoonz Visits <i>Murthy v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) lcb11@psu.edu Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:40 am
v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 8:02 pm
Vertex Development v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
Corp. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
Paglinawan v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 4:05 am
[T]he animating principle in New York Times v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:48 am
This is an interesting attorneys' fees decision that says that New Yorkers who were able to force the state to allow them have a wedding ceremony at the height of the COVID-19 crisis cannot recover attorneys' fees because they technically were not prevailing parties -- even though the Northern District of New York granted them an injunction so they could proceed with the wedding.The case DiMartile v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 1:38 pm
See Bowers v. [read post]
