Search for: "Henkels "
Results 41 - 60
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2018, 2:55 am
Adams joined the Dial Corporation (now a company of Henkel), where he eventually was appointed Manager of International Technology Coordination, covering all of Dial’s product categories. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Henkel, the Supreme Court interpreted the provision broadly to include “any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing, or defeating the lawful function of any department of government. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:21 am
This interpretation seems to align well with earlier decisions by the Court, according to which the special head of jurisdiction in Art 16(1) Brussels I is only available personally to the consumer who is party to the consumer contract in question (Case C-89/91 Shearson Lehman Hutton, [23]; Case C-167/00 Henkel), [33]), and according to which the assignment of a claim does not affect international jurisdiction under the Brussels I Regulation (Case C-352/13 CDC Hydrogene Peroxide,… [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
Again congratulations to the organizers of this fabulous event (who, again, gave very impressive presentations of their own): Adrian Walters, Chicago-Kent College of Law, and Christoph Henkel, Mississippi College School of Law. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
See Henkel v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Henkel Corp., et al., No. 17-1231, U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm
Henkel, cited above). [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm
NAD Cleans Up Persil Advertising Claims On May 25, 2017, Henkel Consumer Goods, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm
NAD Cleans Up Persil Advertising Claims On May 25, 2017, Henkel Consumer Goods, Inc. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:56 am
NuScience moved for reconsideration contending that after it took Henkel’s default, Henkel called NuScience’s attorney and said NuScience “better back off and leave [them] alone” and that Henkels thereafter began posting threats to publish NuScience’s trade secret formula on the Internet. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:56 am
NuScience moved for reconsideration contending that after it took Henkel’s default, Henkel called NuScience’s attorney and said NuScience “better back off and leave [them] alone” and that Henkels thereafter began posting threats to publish NuScience’s trade secret formula on the Internet. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 5:32 am
NuScience moved for reconsideration contending that after it took Henkel’s default, Henkel called NuScience’s attorney and said NuScience “better back off and leave [them] alone” and that Henkels thereafter began posting threats to publish NuScience’s trade secret formula on the Internet. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
***The Fairfield County Business Journal reports on a new non-compete suit brought by Sun Products and Henkel against a former Chief Technology Officer/Senior Vice-President for Research and Development, Carlos Linares. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
In TC Heartland, the accused infringer has asked the Supreme Court to reset the law of venue and give effect to the statutory statement that infringement actions be brought either (1) “in the judicial district where the defendant resides” or (2)” where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
Henkel, supra. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
Henkel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In Bongrain SA’s Trade Mark Application [2004] EWCA Civ 1690 at [26]-[28], Jacobs LJ had, interpreting various European case law including Joined Cases C-456/01P and C-457/01 P Henkel v OHIM EU:C:2004:258, rejected the idea that a “fancy” or unusual shape of goods would automatically be taken by the public as a trade mark denoting trade origin. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:33 am
An earlier study by Henkel and Zischka came to essentially the same conclusion (78% partial or total invalidity for decisions from 2010 to 2012), but draws different policy recommendations.For software and telecommunications patents, the invalidation rate is even higher at 88% (58% totally invalid, 30% partially invalid, 12% maintained). [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
**Federal Trade Commission Staff Provide Guidance on Regulations Proscribing the “All or Virtually All” Standard for Made in the USA labeling** . . . [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 11:15 am
The opinion overruled the California Supreme Court’s prior decision in Henkel Corp. v. [read post]
