Search for: "Henry v. State of Delaware" Results 41 - 60 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Wang (Harvard Business School), on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
Mangino, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Friday, June 2, 2017 Tags: Appraisal rights, Auctions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fair values, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions The Role of Social Capital in Corporations: A Review Posted by Henri Servaes, London Business School and Ane Tamayo, London School of Economics, on Saturday, June 3, 2017 Tags: Corporate… [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
Only three states still have separate courts of equity—Delaware, Mississippi, and Tennessee—though a handful of other states do draw some jurisdictional distinction between law and equity cases.[12] But in all fifty states “equity” remains part of the everyday vocabulary of courts and lawyers. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Opening Remarks: Henry Smith—exploring the connections between private law and IP. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
Corp. v Utilisave, LLC (which I wrote about here) where the court dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction a petition seeking dissolution of a Delaware LLC. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Feb. 28, 2012) (applying Oregon law).Rhode Island:  Henry v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
  Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
The issue was recently considered by the Delaware Chancery court in  Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  We found a lot of cases – at least something useful from 42 jurisdictions:  all except Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.As alluded to earlier, plaintiffs sometimes try to overcome inconvenient facts about a failure to read warnings with quirky arguments that the defendant should have communicated in a different fashion. [read post]