Search for: "Hernandez, Appeal of" Results 41 - 60 of 1,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2014, 4:52 pm by Tom Smith
The Hernandez family appealed, and, this June, the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:28 pm by Steve Kalar
Hernandez argues on appeal that the evidence was insufficient to prove that the specifically charged conduct was done ‘willfully. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:49 am
The Third District Court of Appeal upheld the decision for a different reason, saying Padilla could not be applied retroactively. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
When the New York County Civil Court dismissed her case against ConEd and Asphalt, Hernandez appealed to the Appellate Term, First Department. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:05 pm
[JURIST] Lawyers for five Cubans jailed for spying in the United States urged a federal appeals court Monday to order a new trial in the case, arguing that the defendants were convicted on flimsy evidence. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:38 am by Susan Brenner
  The Court of Appeals then found that Hernandez’s argument on appeal was directed only to the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction under section (a)(7). [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 3:06 pm by Steve Kalar
Id.At sentencing, the district court found Yuman-Hernandez had not met his burden to prove sentencing entrapment argument, and imposed the mand-min sentence of 180 months.Issue(s): “Yuman–Hernandez appeals his . . . mandatory-minimum sentence, assigning error to the district court's rejection of his sentencing entrapment argument. [read post]
22 May 2020, 7:33 am
Dix married Hernandez, then an undocumented immigrant, in 2015, and Hernandez became an important part of the business.... [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 8:35 pm
Professional objectors make a handsome living exploiting the flaws in class action rules, particularly regarding the objector’s right to appeal. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The Court of Appeals disagreed, saying in part:It is true that each of Hernandez’s posts expressed hostility toward, and sought to denigrate or mock, a major religious faith and its adherents. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:57 am by Steve Kalar
“In Alcaraz-Garcia, we ruled that for the purpose of calculating the time to appeal, a criminal forfeiture proceeding is civil in nature . . . [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 2:41 am by Michael DelSignore
In Hernandez's case, the Suffolk County Grand Jury issued a subpoena for Hernandez's cell phone, which Hernandez had already delivered to his lawyers for safekeeping. [read post]