Search for: "Herrera v. United States District Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Herrera v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
The district court and the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 1:42 pm
Those cases are: Herrera v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 10:54 am
Examining the Supreme Court’s most significant ruling on a claim of innocence based on new, post-trial evidence — Herrera v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Albrecht, 17-290 (pre-emption), Herrera v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The case is being appealed after a District of Columbia district court decided the Wiretap Act doesn’t create a right of action against a foreign State in US courts.[3] The second fact pattern concerned a State-directed cyber-attack against a company physically located in the US in retaliation for an act of expression considered offensive. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
" United States v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Raoul, Herrera v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
United States, meaning that the court will be making yet another foray into the “categorical approach” to determining whether prior convictions are “crimes of violence” for sentencing purposes. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
The district court allowed the state designated representative t [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Title: Herrera v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Gomez-Herrera, No. 07-10153 A sentence for illegal reentry following removal is affirmed over a primary claim that Kimbrough v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:06 pm
On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 11:01 am
US v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
