Search for: "Herring v. Commissioner"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,504
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
And finally…II After the judgments on Jaffa Cakes and flapjacks, we now have a judicial consideration of poppadums (and other foodstuffs): Walkers Snack Foods Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC [2024] UKFTT 00031 (TC): “[39]. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
The Supreme Court cited with approval its previous guidance given in the case of Fowler v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2020] UKSC 22 on the application of deeming provisions in legislation. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
A public employee is entitled to a name-clearing hearing only in the event her or his employer creates and disseminates a false and defamatory impression about the employee in connection with the termination, citing Codd v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
A public employee is entitled to a name-clearing hearing only in the event her or his employer creates and disseminates a false and defamatory impression about the employee in connection with the termination, citing Codd v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:20 am
Hosp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 1:34 am
In Vabuolas v British Columbia (Information and Privacy Commissioner) 2024 BCSC 27, two former members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses each sought disclosure from their former congregations of all records that included their personal information, relying on the terms of British Columbia’s Personal Information Protection Act SBC 2003. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
As FCC Commissioners, we are deeply concerned that Big Tech’s expansive position threatens free speech and is inconsistent with the nation’s communications regulatory framework. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm
Jarkesy, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 3:17 am
In Navroth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Thus, in Lawson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 5:58 pm
Commissioner,[1] Sandy and her daughter Leda were co-trustees of a revocable living trust that Sandy had created. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the 2022 case that overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:40 am
She has appeared at the Supreme Court in a number of significant cases including representing Liberty in DSD v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, which imposed an operational duty on the police force to conduct a proper investigation into allegations of ill treatment. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 am
See Section 191-d (7)(b)(i) and (v). [read post]
