Search for: "Herring v. Reid" Results 41 - 60 of 324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
H’s parents maintain that they never agreed to Ms Reid meeting their son, but the judge said: I think it unlikely that she [the mother] gave her express permission but I am quite clear that she enthusiastically contrived with Ms Reid to facilitate the interview. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:51 am by SHG
And indeed, there is much to support her reading of precedent. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
General damages Whilst no case was identified to assist the Judge directly with the assessment of general damages, the Judge considered a number of authorities including MGN Limited v Representative Claimants [2015] EWCA Civ 1291, Reid v Price [2020] EWHC 594 (QB), Re TP (Kemp & Kemp, Vol 3 C2-002), ABC and WH v Willock [2015] EWHC 2687 (QB) and Bull v Desporte [2019] EWHC 1650 (QB) from which it is possible to draw the following guidance: The… [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
Reid, 12 How., at 366; McDonald, 238 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
 Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:30 am by NL
Pritchard & Ors v Teitelbaum & Ors [2011] EWHC 1063 (Ch) This case forms part of the aftermath of Fineland Investments Ltd v Janice Vivien Pritchard [2011] EWHC 113 (Ch) (our report here). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:30 am by NL
Pritchard & Ors v Teitelbaum & Ors [2011] EWHC 1063 (Ch) This case forms part of the aftermath of Fineland Investments Ltd v Janice Vivien Pritchard [2011] EWHC 113 (Ch) (our report here). [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff has pleaded that, but for defendants' malpractice in failing to advise her properly, she "would have avoided some actual ascertainable damage" (see IMO Indus. v Anderson Kill & Olick, 267 AD2d 10, 11 [1999]), [*2]including sufficient detail as to the "nature of" the underlying claim (see Reid v Druckman, 309 AD2d 669 [2003]). [read post]