Search for: "Hicks v. State of New York" Results 41 - 60 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
Courts have similarly determined that an offender’s possession of child abuse images causes harm to the depicted children.The United States Supreme Court first acknowledged such harm in 1982 in New York v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:06 am by Susan Brenner
This post is about a New York case in which a state judge held that a Blackberry was seized lawfully . . . a holding I tend to disagree with, at least in part. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
  Except for DES, market share liability had been universally rejected in New York. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:44 am
Morris, United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York The Honorable Mary Grace Diehl, United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Georgia Professor Jack Williams, Georgia State University College of Law 11:20 am – 11:50 am Coffee and Refreshments 11:50 am – 12:50 pm Panel Discussion “Ethics 2.0—The Ethical Challenges and Pitfalls Web 2.0 Presents to Bankruptcy Attorneys”: The… [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Hicks and two other plaintiffs worked for the New York State Office of Children and Family Services, mandated in part to protect children from violence and abuse. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 12:50 am
Baines NEW YORK COUNTYContractsPresence of Bonus Payable After One Year Did Not Bring At-Will Contracts Within Statute of FraudsNichols v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In a brave, new preemption world, such things might amount to breaches in the dike preventing liability. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
  New York took a huge step towards adopting the Model Rules and saw some of its new advertising rules enjoined on constitutional grounds. [read post]