Search for: "Hill v. Miller" Results 41 - 60 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Rollin'
13 Aug 2006, 1:51 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
Tax & Business Law Commentary - http://taxbiz.blogspot.com/
MSC Opinion: Kyser v. Kasson Township
16 Jul 2010, 11:42 am by Gaëtan Gerville-Réache
  Citing extensively to Brae Burn, Inc v Bloomfield Hills, 350 Mich 425, 430-431; 86 NW2d 166 (1957), the Court held that an ordinance is not invalid just because it bars the most profitable land use. [read post]
One Court of Justice - http://www.ocjblog.com
Second District Rejects CEQA And Fair Transit Hearing Challenges To LA Metro’s Westside Subway Extension Project In Lengthy Published Opinion
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
B256605); The City of Beverly Hills v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Conditional Site Plan Approval Not Enough to Create Vested Right in Prior Zoning
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
New York Zoning and Municipal Law Blog - http://blog.szlawfirm.net/
Fourth District Holds CEQA Challenge To Ministerial Approval Of Development Project Modifications Barred By Res Judicata, Water Supply Assessment Not Required
1 Oct 2018, 2:28 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Tide Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Arguing Impacts By Proxy: Fourth District Holds CEQA Does Not Require EIR Absent Evidence That Subdivision Approval Actually Violated Applicable Land Use Regulations Adopted to Mitigate Environmental Impacts
19 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Monday round-up
19 Sep 2016, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
On Prawfsblog, Steve Vladeck discusses how last Term’s decision in Montgomery v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
What’s On Their Minds: Who Gets the Rent Money? LRC Realty, Inc. v. B.E.B. Properties New Par, d.b.a. Verizon Wireless, et al., v. Bruce Bird, et al
6 Jan 2020, 6:49 am by MBettman
Co. v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
Legal Malpractice in the Eyes of the Beholder
31 Jan 2012, 2:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 58 AD3d 1, 9-10 [2008]; Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 [2004]. [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
$1.5 Million Jury Verdict in Lawsuit Over Delayed Cesarean Section
16 Sep 2015, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Maxberry v. [read post]
Chicago Birth Injury Lawyers Blog - http://www.chicagobirthinjurylawyersblog.com/
NJ Appeals Court: No Privacy Violation When Spouse Uses GPS to Track Vehicle -- Villanova v. Innovative Investigations, Inc.
8 Jul 2011, 10:00 am by Venkat
In Miller v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Which Decisions Have Excluded Dr. Parisian, And About What?
14 Aug 2013, 1:57 pm
Parisian’s Testimony:  Miller v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
An Everyday Application of Fiduciary Breach and Deceit
5 May 2010, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 58 AD3d 1, 9-10 [2008]; Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 [2004]. [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
Waiver of Florida Homestead Exemption in Unsecured Agreement Unenforceable
5 Mar 2014, 2:32 pm by Jordan E. Bublick
Miller Mfg. [read post]
Miami Florida Bankruptcy Law - http://jbublick.blogspot.com/
California Supreme Court Construes CEQA’s “Unusual Circumstances” Exception to Categorical Exemptions in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley Decision
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am by Arthur F. Coon
” The project’s geotechnical engineer, Alan Kropp, disagreed, asserting he had conducted the necessary investigations and found no landslide hazard and that Karp had materially misread the project plans in raising “side-hill fill” concerns, when no such fill would occur. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
9th Cir Holds Defendant Removing Under CAFA Must Prove with "Legal Certainty" That Amount in Controversy is More Than $5 Million
24 Apr 2007, 1:19 am
Ivy Hill Corp., 410 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir.2005). [read post]
Federal Civil Practice Bulletin - http://federalcivilpracticebulletin.blogspot.com/
Summary 2012 WY 65
9 May 2012, 1:31 pm by WSLL
GONZALEZ v. [read post]
Law Library Letter - http://wyolawlibrary.blogspot.com/
Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 1 today (and 12 NFP)
7 Aug 2007, 12:02 pm
Hill v. [read post]
The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/
First District Upholds CEQA Class 3 Categorical Exemption For Single Family Residence Projects In Berkeley Hills, Rejects Claim That “Location” Exception Applies Based On Site’s Location Within Mapped Earthquake Fault And Landslide Areas
12 Feb 2019, 10:30 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Summary 2010 WY 119
19 Aug 2010, 9:28 am by Meg Martin
Hill delivered the decision.Link: http://tinyurl.com/252uzb2 . [read post]
Law Library Letter - http://wyolawlibrary.blogspot.com/