Search for: "Hill v. Texas Government" Results 41 - 60 of 389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2012, 7:10 am by Kali Borkoski
  At The Hill’s Healthwatch blog (h/t Howard Bashman), Sam Baker examines a possible weakness in the government’s position defending the individual mandate:  If Congress has the power to enforce the insurance mandate, where does that power stop? [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 10:07 am by Michael Grossman
What Law Governs Guardrail Spearing Injuries in Texas Gyms Are Not The Only Businesses with Obligations. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
  Lydia Wheeler of The Hill reports on the looming end of the Term, suggesting that a “short-handed Supreme Court is limping to the finish line. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage focused on the decision and the 2016 presidential campaign comes from Alan Rappeport of The New York Times, Nolan McCaskill and Nick Gass of Politico,and Sarah Ferris of The Hill, while Amber Phillips of The Washington Post interviews Texas state senator Wendy Davis, who filibustered the law for eleven hours in 2013. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 9, 2011 Liberty University, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am by Allison Trzop
At PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills argues that the Court “punted” in the case, by ducking what he characterized as the central question: “When can a governmental actor condition a private firm’s access to a government-owned facility on compliance with the government’s rules? [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]