Search for: "Hogans v. Hogans Agency" Results 41 - 60 of 131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Shana Tabak
Wiss, Partner, Hogan & Hartson 2000:   Ruth Lapidoth, Professor, Hebrew University Faculty of Law 1999:   Patricia Viseur Sellers, Legal Advisor for Gender Related Crimes and Senior Acting Trial Attorney in the Office of the Prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda 1997: Lea Browning, Hogan & Hartson Sujata V. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:33 am by Scott Bomboy
Fueling these theories were comments made in a 2017 Supreme Court decision, Packingham v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm by Bernie Burk
  Kroll International and smaller organizations called Black Cube and PSOPS were agencies Weinstein and his lawyers used on more than one occasion. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am by Jim Sedor
MarylandFacing Minor Fine, Hogan Campaign Lawyer Threatens Attorney General FroshWashington Post – Fenit Nirappil | Published: 8/31/2017 Maryland Gov. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Davis Polk memo explains: The case, Susquehanna International Group, LLP, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
Slightly “more troubling” was an incident in which, due to a misunderstanding of the procedures, a CIA-connected individual (his exact role is redacted) improperly minimized a number of reports prior to disseminating them to other agencies. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
The Sanderson Farm test data was the topic for a Nov. 8 meeting involving Almanza and visitors headed by veteran Hogan Lovels attorney Gary Kushner. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Michael Geist, Law Professor at the University of Ottowa, has written that trust in Canadian surveillance agencies has been ‘irreparably harmed’ after recent revelations in Canada about the surveillance of journalists. [read post]
That month, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) invalidated Safe Harbor as a data transfer mechanism in the case Schrems v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Link to US Scotus opinion on enhanced damages in patent cases , Halo v Pulse https://t.co/vpXI1MQmc4 -> Cable companies launch court battle against 'free TV' Android box vendors https://t.co/nXbDK1iEx6 -> Courtroom to riches? [read post]