Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,255
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2024, 7:01 am
”) (quoting United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:49 am
In Szalai v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am
As in the Atari case, Brandy Melville sued Redbubble in the United States District Court for the Central District of California for contributory infringement of the company’s trademark, specifically the Brandy Melville Heart Mark and LA Lightning Mark. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
For the most part these trade disputes have been with the United States before NAFTA and Canada-U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:25 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Holder.) [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
Section 3 states that "No person" can hold any state or federal office if they had previously been "a member of Congress, or … an officer of the United States" or a state official and then "engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 9:27 pm
At issue legally is Title 17 of the United States Code. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Reversing theDistrict Court’s operative holding, the majority concludedthat for purposes of Section 3, the Presidency is an officeunder the United States and the President is an officer ofthe United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:51 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
In 2019, the United States recognized Venezuela’s Interim President Juan Guaidó as the lawful head of state. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:48 pm
§ 2401(a) of the United States Code generally requires that the complaint to commence such an action must be “filed within six-years after the right of action accrues. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
John Mikhail, Georgetown Law, has a post up on Balkinization entitled A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding, in which he draws upon the research he conducted on the phrase in connection with his study of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:47 am
This term, for instance, the Supreme Court is also considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in a case known as Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
SCOTUS Ducking the Trump Eligibility Question Now will Pressure the Court to Rule in his Favor Later
16 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
The first installment focused on Justice Gorsuch's colloquies about Officers of the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
