Search for: "Holland v. United States Attorney General"
Results 41 - 60
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
TPM’s Sahil Kapur covers today’s reaction from Attorney General Eric Holder. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
United States, Maracich v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
The court stated that claim construction implies construing the use of drafting techniques (Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Ali is another such case:By its own terms, however, the VCPA does not apply to “[a]ny aspect of a consumer transaction which aspect is authorized under laws or regulations of this Commonwealth or the United States, or the formal advisory opinions of any regulatory body or official of this Commonwealth or the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
United States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 (1996); United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
Twenty-four State Attorneys General signed an Amicus Brief in support of Arizona, as did the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
For cases or attorney general opinions holding or suggesting that there is a right to carry openly, see State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:15 am
Hubbard, Deputy Attorney General; Martin L. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:39 am
However, courts have sometimes noted egregious attorney misconduct, on the part of both defense counsel (Holland v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:53 am
United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
