Search for: "Holmes v. Grant County"
Results 41 - 60
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
See Alexander Holmes, Appellant-Defendant, v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
The district court exercised jurisdiction and granted the insurers' motions for declaratory judgment. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
” The Court followed that up by reversing the 6th Circuit’s grant of habeas in another case, affirming in Bobby v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
As struggles in Westchester County, Dallas, St. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The original statement comes from Justice Holmes, who wrote in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The original statement comes from Justice Holmes, who wrote in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 11:17 am
Comment This is, in many ways, a revamped version of Lord Neuberger’s statement in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council (2009) UKHL 7, that – as put in this judgment: “In examining the reasons for a decision, the court should adopt a benevolent approach. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
It is an act for which he or she is accountable under the Constitution: As Justice Holmes stated almost a century ago in Biddle v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 9:10 am
See Holmes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:56 am
Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Gibbons [2010] EWCA Civ 327 This was the Court of Appeal judgment on a second appeal from a s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeal in the County Court. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:47 am
Holmes v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
Ramirez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:03 pm
Ramirez v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
The motion was granted by the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
The motion was granted by the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
One of them fell by the wayside (Manchester v Mushin), while another has been granted PTA to the Supreme Court, but has been stayed pending the outcome of these cases (Salford v Mullen - the lead case in the Court of Appeal, somewhat bizarrely as Salford weren't even represented there). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
One of them fell by the wayside (Manchester v Mushin), while another has been granted PTA to the Supreme Court, but has been stayed pending the outcome of these cases (Salford v Mullen - the lead case in the Court of Appeal, somewhat bizarrely as Salford weren't even represented there). [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:00 pm
Holmes v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:10 am
Holme, 35 A.D.3d 93, 98 (1st Dep‘t 2006). [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
______________________________Argued April 27, 2021 – Decided June 15, 2021Before Judges Fisher, Gilson and Gummer.On appeal from an interlocutory order of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Burlington County, Docket No. [read post]
