Search for: "Holmes v. Holmes" Results 41 - 60 of 1,875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2014, 10:19 pm by Ben
Supreme Court has confirmed that it wont won't hear an appeal in the "Sherlock Holmes" case (Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate) in which in which the Court of Appeals for the 7th Circui upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author and lawyer Mr Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that are no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am by Ben
In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:13 pm by Matthew D. Lee
On May 30, the newly-formed Philadelphia Chapter of the Federal Bar Association’s Section on Taxation will host a meet-and-greet event with the Honorable Mark V. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
(NYPL)Oliver Wendell Holmes’s dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 12:30 pm
Holm stole "a television, valued at $662.23, and three boxes of golf balls, valued at $50 each, from the Santa Rosa Golf and Country Club. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
“The time has come to blow the whistle on the Holmes Devise History of The Supreme Court,” a young professor of law at the University of Wisconsin named Mark V. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:02 pm by Ashley Sundin
  Chief Judge Ruben Castillo of the Northern District of Illinois relied on a similar case, Silverman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm
However, sometimes insurers will refuse to pay for injuries or procedures that they believe do not fall within their "scope," which was the case with Holmes v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 3:58 am
Thanks to Mark P for noticing that Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond is going to the House of Lords. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:18 am by Christine Corcos
Conspicuously absent from that typical pantheon of error is perhaps the worst of all, second only to Dred Scott—Buck v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:18 am
Conspicuously absent from that typical pantheon of error is perhaps the worst of all, second only to Dred Scott—Buck v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:22 am
” Although Holmes may not have seen the difference between this conclusion and the clear and present danger idea he offered contemporaneously in Schenck v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:22 am by Christine Corcos
” Although Holmes may not have seen the difference between this conclusion and the clear and present danger idea he offered contemporaneously in Schenck v. [read post]