Search for: "Holmes v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 1,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Their only power -- to seek state punishment for rule violators -- is a regressive function. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
It is often asserted that the takings clause of the 5th Amendment, and its state counterparts, were understood to cover only appropriation of title and physical invasion, and had no application to regulations of property until the opinion by Holmes in Pennsylvania Coal. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Supreme Court case, Relentless Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:52 am by Ben Sperry
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (1919) (Holmes, J., dissenting)). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The article complained of had said that Neumann “defrauded” investors in We Work and likened him to convicted fraudster Elizabeth Holmes. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Commerce Clause, in Nation and States,” at the U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
But at least Justice Holmes acknowledged that "[o]f course an employee of the United States does not secure a general immunity from state law while acting in the course of his employment. [read post]