Search for: "Hooks v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 720
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 12:30 pm by Justin P. Webb
Back in April, Jeffrey wrote that Antoine Jones wasn't off the hook for his crimes because of the ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:47 am by INFORRM
In Re:Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Curcuit, a hearing in the case that alleges that Viacom and Google unlawfully used cookies to track children’s web browsing and video-watching habits on Viacom websites. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
“The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am by SHG
Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that the due process and equal protection principles of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibit ‘‘punishing a person for his poverty. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
He says she relentlessly pursued for at least nine months before he gave in and hooked up with her. [read post]
  Plaintiffs also alleged that Pacific Seafood, the largest seafood-buying company in the United States, either monopolized or attempted to monopolize west coast markets for Pacific seafood. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 10:15 am
This violated the defendants' Sixth Amendment right to counsel.The decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:55 am by Eugene Volokh
We recently held that "'the government may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected ... freedom of speech even if he has no entitlement to that benefit.'" United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm by Usha Rodrigues
Many have already weighed in on Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:55 am by Eugene Volokh
We recently held that "'the government may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected ... freedom of speech even if he has no entitlement to that benefit.'" United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:35 am by Charles Sartain
The court of appeal based its analysis on two recent Supreme Court cases, Hooks v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 5:36 am
  Traditionally, N.Y. has been one of the few states in the United States that did  NOT permit a “bad faith” claim against an insurance carrier except under VERY limited circumstances. [read post]