Search for: "Hope v. Trump et al" Results 41 - 60 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
’”At Casetext, David Boyle surveys the “’Christian’ amicus briefs” “either for Petitioners, Trump et al., or for neither party. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am by Colby Pastre
Key Findings In December 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), arguably the most significant piece of tax legislation in three decades. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 5:30 pm by John Mikhail
Today our lawyers sent a letter to Judge Daniels acknowledging an errorin footnote 82 of our amicus brief in CREW et al., v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Davis Polk memo explains: The case, Susquehanna International Group, LLP, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:41 pm by Peter Margulies
In contrast, the government’s position that neither grandmothers et al. nor refugee agency assurances counted as a “bona fide relationship” would have given the government virtually all that it sought. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:03 am by Ad Law Defense
  James Boswell et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:03 am by Ad Law Defense
  James Boswell et al. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  However, hope that we can get more consensus by going to empirical claims is probably futile, as Dan Kahan et al have said in many other legal contexts. [read post]