Search for: "House v. City of Atlanta"
Results 41 - 60
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2019, 1:36 pm
Two men are driving through rural Alabama from Atlanta to Dallas. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:05 am
v=qlRtLGorhdY Pricing: Per month per user fees. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:02 pm
Jewel v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:03 am
" At 5:40 that morning, city officials had been made aware that a particular strain of SamSam ransomware had brought municipal services in Atlanta to a halt. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
The court ruled 7-to-2 against the city, saying Lozman’s houseboat was more house than boat. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010). [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:07 am
City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010). [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 10:55 am
City of Anoka, 2016 U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 2:26 pm
Felio v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm
On November 3, 2015, voters in Houston, Texas, the nation’s fourth largest city, soundly rejected a proposed equal rights ordinance which sought to outlaw discrimination based upon sexual orientation and gender identity in city employment, city services, city contracting practices, housing, public accommodations and private employment. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:57 am
Michigan v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:59 am
"Why," his friend replies, "has our city gotten that f**king bad? [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:43 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Massey Housing America’s Native People Wendy L. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:17 pm
City of Atlanta, 774 F.2d 1495, 1509 (11th Cir.1985) (Tjoflat, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), abrogated on other grounds by Graham v. [read post]
