Search for: "Housing Authority of the City and County of San Francisco v. All Persons" Results 41 - 60 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 8:55 pm by Rory Little
Alito’s opinion hewed closely to the excessive force precedent of Graham v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
City and County of San Francisco, 14-704, which in addition to the four relists also has been rescheduled once, asks whether the Second Amendment bars a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them on their persons. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
City & County of San Francisco, No. 05-17080, 06-15566 An order denying qualified immunity in an 42 U.S.C. section 1983 class action suit is affirmed where, under the circumstances of this case, San Francisco's blanket policy of strip searching without reasonable suspicion of all individuals arrested and classified for housing in the general jail population violated the arrestees' clearly established… [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:57 am
Now, Mary Alexander, the San Francisco personal-injury lawyer representing the plaintiff, faces a fight to get the insurance companies to pay. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – Former Recology Employee Indicted for Alleged San Francisco Bribery, Following Prior Charges Waste Dive – Cole Rosengern | Published: 7/25/2022 John Porter, who was charged with bribery last year in connection with a broader corruption scandal in San Francisco, was indicted on related federal charges recently. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:54 pm
The musical interlude occurred in Alito's major ruling in Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
County of San Bernardino (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 352 holding that the imposition of an administrative leave may constitute an adverse employment action. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1967), DHS contends that the protection of children is an essential societal value and thus the interests it serves through home visits are more worthy of the public's concern than are Mother's interests in the protection of the sanctity of her home. [read post]