Search for: "Howell v. Administrator"
Results 41 - 60
of 232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2012, 1:58 am
Howell, both of the Wiley Rein LLP law firm. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 7:29 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in El-Hady v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:18 am
Supreme Court NML Capital Ltd v Argentina [2011] UKSC 31 (6 July 2011) McDonald, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33 (6 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Dalton v Nottinghamshire County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 776 (06 July 2011) AH v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 787 (06 July 2011) Howell & Ors v Lees- Millais & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 786 (06 July… [read post]
10 Aug 2019, 4:34 am
He also shared the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 9:20 am
Circuit in Qasim v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 5:08 am
Circuit ruled in the case of Qassim v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm
Bruen, and the tech privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 5:16 am
Margaret Taylor provided a comprehensive summary of oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:27 am
Howell, U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
Katherine Pompilio posted the Supreme Court decision in Egbert v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm
Rules create the so-called “bright lines” between entitlement and disentitlement; rules are also, by their nature, insensitive to particular household circumstances.In two recent decisions of the the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeal Chamber, the rules have been challenged as being insufficiently sensitive to individual household needs: RG v SSWP and North Wiltshire DC (HB) [2011] UKUT 198 (AAC) and IB v Birmingham CC [2011] UKUT 23 (AAC). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 7:06 am
Howell handed the Secret Service and the Obama Administration a setback this week, ruling that White House visitor logs are agency records subject to being produced under the Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. sec. 552] unless shielded by one of the Act's exemptions.The issue of public access to visitors lists has plagued both the Bush and Obama White House occupancies (see "TUOL" posts 9/7/09, 7/23/09), but in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am
Patja Howell shared the latest installment of the Culper Partners Rule of Law Series on the Lawfare Podcast, in which Nate Jones and David Kris spoke with former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick: Fogel shared a petition for rehearing en banc from the appellant in McKeever v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:40 am
” A coalition of 13 U.S. states is suing the Trump administration over its new immigration policy, Reuters writes. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:10 am
Robert Chesney provided an in-depth analysis of the legal and policy lessons learned from Doe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery chronicled the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
