Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 41 - 60
of 526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 6:52 am
See Backpage.com v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
They were walking down the road back toward their house when a Department of Correction truck driven by Jeffrey McKay crashed into and killed Woods’ son. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm
How to avoid alphabet soup in your legal writing. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Baroness Barran, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education replied: “My Lords, the UK is a proud signatory of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
This article examines how Florida Workers’ Compensation system manages claims involving violence in the workplace, including possible doctrines and defenses that may preclude coverage. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
[xiv] VLJs obtain their position by Board Chairman recommendation, Secretary of Veteran Affairs appointment, and approved by the president. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Secretary v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
In 2015, it was former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s use of a private email server. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
If the debt ceiling is unconstitutional, does it automatically default to the president to raise more debt, more specifically to direct the Treasury Secretary to issue more debt? [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
Amongst its roles, the ICO is obliged to consider complaints from members of the public about how organisations handle their data, and investigate those complaints. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:26 pm
How are we going to do that? [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
After the Supreme Court decided California v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:38 am
The core of the litigation concerned how the Secretary was counting Tribal populations for purposes of distributing the COVID-related funds. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
Warby LJ, with whom Sharp P and Singh LJ agreed, held that Steyn J had been correct in principle to reconsider the issue of serious harm in relation to the period after Ms Cadwalladr’s public interest defence fell away. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
Personal jurisdiction was not addressed, and it is impossible to see how the standard “minimum contacts” test under the Fifth Amendment (assuming, as many courts have held, that it is the correct standard) would be satisfied. [read post]
