Search for: "Hughes v. Edwards" Results 41 - 60 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 2:27 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:04 am by CMS
Rory Thomson, a senior associate in the Insurance and Reinsurance Group at CMS, previews the appeal pending in the case of Edwards v Hugh James Ford Simey (a firm). [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the estate of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors was heard on 25th July. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 25 July, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
The court addressed who owned what copyright in computer software developed by a service provider, but where the express contractual provisions left a lacuna as to IPR ownership.Annsley Merelle Ward reviews the ex tempore decision of Mr Justice Carr in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
School Board of Prince Edward County, “ordering the County to reopen and fund public schools which had been closed during the era of “Massive Resistance’ in Virginia” to Brown v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
Dáire McCormack-GeorgeIntroduction Earlier this month, I presented a paper at the Socio-Legal Studies Association Annual Conference at the University of Leeds, ‘On the Nature of Work and the Purpose of Labour Law’. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
– Brian Cathcart Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward Craven Defamation Act 2013: The public interest defence and digital communications – Jacob Rowbottom Case Law:… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:27 am
In the wake of the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (IPKat post here), second medical use claims have received considerable attention from the IP commentariat. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:31 am by coghlani
The Daily Sketch, 11th December 1913, covering the appeal of Bebb v The Law Society. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
How the gun control lobbies nearly tricked Congress into banning millions of ordinary guns.Have you heard about the "undetectable plastic gun"? [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
publishers’ right in online publications |  German Court: TV show may not use ‘bloopers’ from other network without permission |  US Congress considers extending copyright term | Swedish ISP Telenor will voluntary block The Pirate Bay | You don't think that street names matter: Try telling your grandchildren that your fancy office is on "Crustacean Street" | Stay of injunction in public interest: Edwards Lifesciences v Boston |… [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Stevens notes Google’s recent refusal to comply with a court order to supress details and remove content related to a local murder trial. [read post]