Search for: "Hughes v. Public Defenders Office"
Results 41 - 60
of 207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
Cases like this are governed by Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
(And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
by guest blogger Heather Whitney To the surprise of no one, a D.C. district court granted summary judgment for the Copyright Office in Thaler v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:44 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:51 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0600n.06 Hughes v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
Defendant had not obtained the Deposit Design from the Copyright Office. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Judges Dyk and Hughes were also on the panel. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:01 am
Summers v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:01 pm
Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in the Hughes v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Legislatively: We may get the CASE Act as part of the continuing resolution: This would mean the institution of copyright Small claims run out of the Copyright Office. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
Perhaps the most powerful law for defending directors and officers is the business judgment rule. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm
I started my career as a novice public defender in January 1971. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:22 am
The Georgia Supreme Court order in Phan v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
That discretion is cabined in two ways:`First, the condition of supervised release must be “reasonably related” to one of four statutory factors: (1) the nature and characteristics of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant; (2) the need for deterrence of criminal conduct; (3) the need to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and (4) the need to provide the defendant with vocational training, medical care, or… [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:52 am
Hugh C. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Liddell, No. 07-1337 In a prosecution for being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of a motion to suppress a post-arrest statement made without the warnings required by Miranda is affirmed where the arresting officers' in-custody questioning fell within the public safety exception to Miranda established in New York v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Around the IP Blogs | TuneIn to the sound of communication to the public (Part 2) | TuneIn to the sound of communication to the public (Part 1) | Book Review: A Practitioner's Guide to European Patent Law by Paul England | [Guest Post] Remember the case of Ai Weiwei v Volkswagen? [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Annsley Merelle Ward writes about the unexpected passing of IP lawyer, Global Chair of Baker McKenzie, husband, father and friend - Paul Rawlinson.Week ending 14 AprilPatentsRose Hughes reports on the IP5 offices conducting a pilot of combined search and examination during the international phase. [read post]
