Search for: "Hughes v. Rose"
Results 41 - 60
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2022, 7:39 pm
For more information, you can refer to PatKat Rose Hughes’ post here. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:23 am
| Sisvel v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 9:49 am
PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes has written a report (here) on a recent decision (J8/20) published by the European Patent Office Board of Appeal which shows that AI is not breaking patent law.Miscellaneous The UK Intellectual Property Office has announced new appointments to its board last week. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am
GuestKat Rose Hughes explained the implications of the UK's incorporation of the SPC Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 469/2009) into domestic law for UK SPC holders, with elements of both continuity and potentially critical change. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
GuestKat Rose Hughes, in When will the appeal fee be refunded? [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:25 am
Alex Woolgar provided further details.Kat Eleonora Rosati examines copyright protection available to fictional characters and the extent to which it could go, looking at the meaning of a 'work' that is sufficiently 'original' and of the 'right kind', as well as how many and which copyrights it would be entitled to.PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes discusses the high-profile CRISPR patent dispute relating to the EPO interpretation of… [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
Typically, the entire tap unit had to be replaced to effect this change.Kat enjoying the output from a cable tap unitCommon General Knowledge and NoveltyFollowing on from Regen Lab v Estar [2019] EWHC (Pat) (Summarised by GuestKat Rose Hughes earlier this week here), HHJ Hacon again raised the question of whether the CGK given as expert witness testimony was meant as CGK in the UK. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am
Hughes: maybe fair use can become broader as the work gets older. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
: G 1/18, the decision | Coloplast v Salts: Should UK infringement proceedings be stayed if the patent has been opposed? [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:52 am
Rose Hughes summed up here and here the PEB’s main guidelines, including the information on designated contacts and on the form of the question paper. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 8:35 am
Patents SpecialKat Rose Hughes reported and commented on two Board of Appeal decisions: · T-0043/18, which concerns the European Patent Office’s approach to novelty for purity of compound inventions (see here). [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 12:09 pm
Rose Hughes reported on the information. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 11:54 am
Rose Hughes provided the news here. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:45 am
If you've been too wrapped up with preparations for the holiday season, here's a summary of the IP news that you might have missed last week:PatentsThis Kat is still contemplating which IP books to put on her Christmas wish-list...Rose Hughes outlined the recent EPO Board of Appeal decision (T 1356/21), which discussed the criterion of novelty for pharmaceutical dosage regimes and selection inventions, as well as the reliance on an unexpected technical effect… [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:40 am
This Kat has sufficiency (of mice) objectionsWelcome to the latest IPKat roundup, which should especially cheer fans of patent news and views.PatentsKodak's most recent endeavours, by way of an announced pivot to generic pharmaceutical manufacturing thanks to a US government COVID-response loan, swiftly followed by an insider trading investigation which put the loan on hold, drew comment from PermaKat Neil Wilkof.In news from Australia, GuestKat Rose Hughes reported on the… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 10:15 pm
CopyrightAsia Correspondent Tian Lu reported on an interesting copyright case in Japan, relating to artworks each comprising of a telephone booth being used as a goldfish tank.PatentsThe finely-tuned balance to be struck between novelty, insufficiency, and obviousness in deciding when to file a second-medical use patent application came under consideration of GuestKat Rose Hughes in relation to the Canadian Federal Court's approach in the recent case of Teva v… [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 3:43 am
| Does the Irish Court of Appeal in Merck v Clonmel part ways from the CJEU's Santen Article 3(d) decision? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:22 am
“Excellences & Perfections” and the saga of Amalia UlmanPatentsInternKat Rose Hughes turns her attention to the topics of claim interpretation and infringement in a recent decision by the UK Court of Appeal: Regeneron v Kymab - Part II: Interpretation and Infringement. [read post]
