Search for: "Hughes v. University of Maine"
Results 41 - 60
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2017, 9:12 am
Guest post by Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Associate Professor at the Texas A&M University School of Law and the Texas A&M College of Engineering. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:39 am
But Oracle v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Chief Justice Hughes in the 1932 case Crowell v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Law Firm Partners and the Scope of Labour Laws Brian Langille, Professor of Law, University of Toronto and Pnina Alon-Shenker, Associate Professor and Director of Ryerson Law & Business Clinic, Ted Rogers School of Management at Ryerson University Reprinted with permission. (2015) 4:2 Canadian Journal of Human Rights 211 Excerpt: Introductory abstract and Parts III and IV[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In Minnesota v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
I am building my profile, but the expense of doing it on my own in a different market universe is too much. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am
This was echoed by Hugh Tomlinson QC who suggested that it was difficult to see how Google could lawfully process sensitive personal data. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
by Dennis Crouch In Teva v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
In Bartnicki v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:44 am
” – Hugh Tomlinson QC [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am
Hoehling v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
Following Case C-410/11 Pedro Sanchez v Iberia where the ECJ asserted jurisdiction in interpreting the Montreal regime, and given the universally binding effect of the ECJ’s preliminary rulings on Member State courts, I suggested here that a hitherto unknown degree of consistency and predictability in the application of the Montreal Convention might be a possibility on the horizon. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 5:34 pm
One of the significant common features of Grosse v Purvis, Doe v ABC and Doe v Yahoo! [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
A workshop organized by HKBU and Tsinghua University, Communication & Visual Arts Building, [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am
A workshop organized by HKBU and Tsinghua University, Communication & Visual Arts Building, Hong Kong Baptist University. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
A workshop organized by HKBU and Tsinghua University, Communication & Visual Arts Building, Hong Kong Baptist University. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There was an Inforrm post by Hugh Tomlinson QC dealing with this contribution to the debate. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
On 12 December 2012, the Court of Appeal (Arden and Lloyd-Jones LJJ and Tugendhat J) handed down judgment in Cammish v Hughes ([2012] EWCA Civ 1655). [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
Also of interest here is this post by Hugh Tomlinson QC, who disagrees with Chakrabarti and points out that she has been misrepresented (she did not, in fact, say that the Leveson proposals, if enacted, would be illegal or incompatible with the HRA). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, Chief Justice Hughes spoke as follows respecting the copyright monopoly granted by Congress, ‘The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
