Search for: "I. Thomas" Results 41 - 60 of 25,067
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2024, 9:06 am by Unknown
I learned this when I did the research to write the biography of Thomas Maule of Salem, reading not only his works and those of others, both in his day and thereafter, but also studying the social and cultural environment in which his fellow citizens, of a different religious persuasion, acquitted him of the seditious libel charges brought by Puritan authorities who resented being tagged as hypocrites. [read post]
24 May 2024, 11:15 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
  “I brought this [bill] to protect the women in Louisiana,” Pressly said. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:16 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“After what I saw on the video of what they did to him, I now know that the police can get [anyone] to confess to killing Abe Lincoln. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm by Christine Kexel Chabot
The language of Article I, Section 9, clause 7 is simple: “No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:37 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Thomas Pressly, has argued the legislation would not prevent the prescribing or dispensing of the drugs “for legitimate reasons. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm by Josh Blackman
Instead, I train my focus where it usually goes: Justice Thomas's concurrence. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part with the majority. [read post]
22 May 2024, 12:42 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
On May 16, Justice Thomas issued the majority opinion in which the Supreme Court held, by a 7-2 vote, that the CFPB’s funding mechanism comported with the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution which states, in relevant part, in Article I, Section 9, Clause 7: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law…” Specifically, Justice Thomas held: “Under the Appropriations Clause, an… [read post]
22 May 2024, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Thomas repeated his charge that arguments in favor of racial preferences mirror the arguments made by segregationists. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
I think progressives will need more than a flashlight if they are going to succeed in the fight. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Thomas answered, matter-of-factly, "I hired Will Consovoy, ask him," and pointed at his clerk. [read post]
21 May 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
But with the numbing down of America, I’m getting closer. [read post]