Search for: "IN RE ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES" Results 41 - 60 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2012, 7:04 am by Theo Francis
The very first example of this general phrasing that we could find was from the 10-Q filed on August 4, 2010, by Advance Micro Devices (AMD): “Also, since our supply chain is complex, we may face reputational challenges with our customers and other stakeholders if we are unable to sufficiently verify the origins for all metals used in our products. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:52 pm
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 542 U.S. 241, 247 (2004).Petitioner‐Appellee Kiobel seeks documents belonging to Royal Dutch Shell (a foreign company) from Shell’s United States counsel, Respondent‐Appellant Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 7:06 pm
While many focus on macro issues with respect to the consequences of COVID.19 (and thus also of planning for future iterations of epidemics of known capacity), relatively little attention has been paid to the micro effects of the COVID-19 epidemic, and especially of its impacts on individuals who are neither large enterprises, rich states, or wealthy individuals or families. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 6:13 am
He also signalled a change in direction for the 'better regulation agenda' to one that is more inclusive and innovative, along with a shift in focus from macro issues to micro dynamics that can uncover what is really going on in the economy at large. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:30 am by Kurt Schulzke
  Assuming the facts are as stated by the SEC, they’re fortunate. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:00 am by Roger Alford
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. that question has vexed lower federal courts. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 10:14 am
Weighing some 50,000 pounds, the device sits on a steel gantry that moves back and forth along tracks that line the field. [read post]
In the second half of the 20th century, advancements in technology and science resolved many of the aforementioned complications. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Are the doctrinal or analytical devices by which we assess likely confusion (or dilution) useful/ideal as means of ensuring such vindication? [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:34 am by Rachel Casper
Download and install the Reface app (previously known as Doublicat) on your iPhone or Android device. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
(IP Factor) Bar Ilan University holds premature ‘After Re Bilski’ conference (IP Factor)   Latin America Madrid protocol in Latin America: a nightmare or a dream? [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:17 pm
**Of the AMD re-structuring, eWeek noted -->The deal that will spin off Advanced Micro Devices' manufacturing facilities into a new joint venture company will not violate the company's licensing agreement with Intel, an AMD spokesman said.On Oct. 7, AMD announced that it would take a bold step and split the company in two in order to better compete in the x86 chip market. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am by Stefanie Levine
RE 39,947 owned by Johnson Research & Development Co., Inc. and entitled TOY WATER GUN. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
In that vein, I’m going to discuss what these AI advances might mean in the micro, to each of us as individuals, and in the macro, to our broader economy and society. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Evident from usual surveys that courts accept that courts don’t really know what they’re trying to measure. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron Technology… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
ATI Technologies, Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices (Patently-O) E D Wisconsin: When can a digital file be a ‘product’ under Section 271(g)? [read post]